ass日本风韵熟妇pics男人扒开女人屁屁桶到爽|扒开胸露出奶头亲吻视频|邻居少妇的诱惑|人人妻在线播放|日日摸夜夜摸狠狠摸婷婷|制服 丝袜 人妻|激情熟妇中文字幕|看黄色欧美特一级|日本av人妻系列|高潮对白av,丰满岳妇乱熟妇之荡,日本丰满熟妇乱又伦,日韩欧美一区二区三区在线

Located in the arid and semi-arid areas of Northwest China, the Hetao Irrigation District of Inner Mongolia is facing both shortage of surface water resources and severe soil salinization, therefore the high-efficient watersaving irrigation methods are the inevitable choice for sustainable agricultural production. A three-year field experiment was conducted to study the effects of different irrigation methods on yield, water productivity and net return of spring maize in the Hetao Irrigation District. Three irrigation methods, i.e., border irrigation (BI), furrow irrigation (FI) and drip irrigation (DI), were compared. Taking the recommended traditional BI water level as the control, three water levels imposed for FI were recommended, namely level (450mm, H), 0.8×recommended level (360mm, M) and 0.6×recommended level (270mm, L), respectively;while the three levels for DI were conducted based on different threshold values of soil water matric potential, i.e., -10kPa (H), -30kPa (M), and -50kPa (L), respectively. Totally seven treatments were implemented by randomized block design with three replicates. The results showed that the grain and straw yields were significantly affected by treatments. Under BI condition, totally average 10% of irrigation water was lost through deep percolation over the studied three years;whereas, under DI conditions, about 10.5~29.0mm water of groundwater was contributed into the root zone through capillary rise for crop water uptake. The response coefficient Ky of maize grain yield-soil water under DI (0.684) was smaller than that under FI (0.8215), indicating that the reduction of crop yield caused by decrease of crop water consumption was smaller under DI than that under FI. That meant DI helped maintain a higher crop yield under potential drought stress than FI. Compared with traditional BI, FI-H (450mm) could increase the grain yield and net return, FI-M (360mm) could save 31% of irrigation water while keeping the grain yield and net yield as same as the control. Compared with BI, DI-H and DI-M treatments could save irrigation water by 19% and 57% respectively, but increase grain yield by 21% and 15%, and increase net yield by 28% and 22%, respectively, resulting in a higher water use efficiency. Therefore, considering the external environmental conditions, including water diverted from the Yellow River, groundwater status and local farmers’ acceptance etc., water level with FI-M or DI-M could be used as an alternative to traditional BI for water-saving irrigation.